Skip to main content
Knowledge mapHow does Proof of History differ from consensus?Industry concepts and standards

You are here. See how this question connects to other ideas.

Select a node to open its page · Expand to read within the map

Knowledge mapFollow a connection. Understand a question.
← Blockchain and shared state

One question

How does Proof of History differ from consensus?

Ordering evidence and acceptance of history are related but distinct.

Solana’s terminology describes Proof of History as verifiable sequential proofs relating data and ordering over time.

As an analogy, numbering meeting records helps discuss sequence, but does not alone decide which records to accept. The analogy is not the cryptographic implementation.

Do not reduce Solana consensus to PoH. Validator participation, voting, fork choice and finality need separate examination, along with the deployed network version.

Sources and further reading

Check your understanding

Can ordering evidence resolve every disagreement by itself?

No. Agreement requires other protocol mechanisms.

Continue along a learning path